Saturday, March 14, 2009

Vivienne Westwood's Spring 2009 Collection: Second Analysis


space and we ain't talking galaxies and shiny stars
what's going on here? Focus should be on the clothes, and focus is brought on to the clothes by use of space. There is such random space, and it's not even being filled in the most attractive ways. I know this is being really nit-picky but the white car has its butt sticking out. It doesn't outline Westwood nicely at all, and near her hip there's this brown log thing, which matches so well with her leggings that it looks like a purse or something. And because you don't see a lot of the 'log thing' it just distorts your eye's attention visually. Aesthetic Confusion. (-1 pt). Plus, the dog's leg jetting out to the left of P-Boobs hip looks like a random strap. Enough though it's dog's tail and leg. It's just all to crazy.
Not really, but still dog-straps-tails never a passable thing. That's it.
I'm calling PETA, I'm on it. Endorsing animal accessories, they should feel all ashamed.

copy cat chilly-willy styles
The dry cactuses get more attention than the actual clothes, why are they upfront and not Westwood who is wearing the ripped up remains of her collection? Maybe she wanted to be in the background to proof herself as a non-attention whore. But really, if your selling, pony-up and get your stuff out there. Standing awkwardly all chilly-willy bagged decked out over your shoulder like your a random kid whose 'running away' by camping on the front steps of her home isn't exactly cutting the deal either.
Composition-wise I agree that's its nice to have random texture and objects everywhere but when the scene is already cluttered with parked cars, palm tree's, parking meters, dogs, telephone poles, shadow's and P-Boobs, there's a lack of focus. No focus can be blamed for bad use of space(-1 pt).

No comments:

Post a Comment